Urajiro in Japanese Dogs: Understanding the Standard of “Good White” vs. “Undesirable White”
- Suda Hiroko すだDOGファーム
- 1 day ago
- 2 min read

If you have ever seen a Shiba Inu or other Japanese dog, you may have noticed patches of white fur around the muzzle, chest, or underside of the body. In Japan, this feature is called urajiro, and it is considered one of the defining traits of the native breeds.
Unlike general “white markings” found in many dog breeds, urajiro is carefully regulated in the Nihon Ken Standard (the official Japanese dog standard). It clearly distinguishes between what is considered “good white” and what is seen as undesirable.
Where Urajiro Is Allowed
According to the standard, urajiro is defined as white fur appearing in the following areas:
Face: on the muzzle and cheeks (but not on the nose bridge or as a reverse mask)
Underside: on the lower jaw, neck, chest, and abdomen
Forechest: allowed up to the shoulder joint, but not spreading widely onto the shoulder
Legs: up to the elbows on the forelegs, and up to the knees on the hindlegs
Tip of the tail
White fur in these specific locations is classified as urajiro and is considered a characteristic trait of the Japanese breeds.

“Good White” vs. “Undesirable White”
Acceptable (“Good”) Urajiro
Appears only within the defined areas
Harmonizes with the dog’s main coat color (red, sesame, black, brindle, or white)
Does not diminish the clarity or balance of the coat
Undesirable White
The standard also lists several cases where white markings are not acceptable:
Excessive urajiro: when white spreads too far and overshadows the main coat color
Reverse mask: white extending across the nose bridge or around the eyes
Sarasa (freckling): conspicuous white spots scattered on the legs
Yogore-jiro (“dirty white”): white areas stained with reddish tones; technically allowed as “white,” but regarded as undesirable
Pinto (piebald) spots: distinct patches of white in areas not defined as urajiro; these are not recognized and are subject to penalties or disqualification
How This Differs from Overseas Standards
In many overseas kennel clubs, Japanese dogs are described as having “white markings” or “cream markings,” but the term urajiro is rarely used. More importantly, the Japanese standard specifies exact locations and boundaries for acceptable white, while overseas standards tend to be less detailed.
This does not mean that urajiro is visually unique to Japan—white markings appear in many breeds worldwide. What makes the Japanese approach distinctive is the precise regulation: defining where white is acceptable, where it is not, and how it affects official judging.

Conclusion
Urajiro is not just a random patch of white—it is a carefully defined element of the Japanese dog standard.
White in the correct places = good urajiro
White that spreads too far, forms spots, or creates a reverse mask = undesirable
By understanding these distinctions, we can better appreciate why Japanese dog standards are so detailed and how they protect the unique traits of native breeds like the Shiba Inu.
So next time you see a Shiba Inu’s white muzzle or chest, remember: it’s not just white fur—it’s urajiro, and it has an official place in the tradition of the Nihon Ken.
Comments